<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[cannabis regulations - Cannabis Law Group]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/tags/cannabis-regulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/tags/cannabis-regulations/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Cannabis Law Group's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:02:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Senator Supports Removing Marijuana as a Controlled Substance]]></title>
                <link>https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/senator-supports-removing-marijuana-as-a-controlled-substance/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/senator-supports-removing-marijuana-as-a-controlled-substance/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Cannabis Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:02:55 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California marijuana legalization]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Enforcement/ California Marijuana]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California cannabis business attorneys]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[cannabis regulations]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Riverside cannabis business attorneys]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Riverside marijuana lawyer]]></category>
                
                
                
                    <media:thumbnail url="https://los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer-com.justia.site/wp-content/uploads/sites/1058/2018/04/marijuana-1621810-639x426-1.jpg" />
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The American people have known for years that times are changing when it comes to marijuana. Now, it seems some politicians at the federal level are starting to wise up and take this issue seriously as well. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) is introducing a bill to remove marijuana from the list of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>The American people have known for years that times are changing when it comes to marijuana. Now, it seems some</p>


<p> politicians at the federal level are starting to wise up and take this issue seriously as well. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) is introducing a bill to remove marijuana from the list of Schedule I narcotics as part of <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title21/html/USCODE-2011-title21-chap13-subchapI-partB-sec812.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. Section 812</a>. He said he also wants to leverage this issue as a way to bolster women and minority cannabis business owners.</p>


<p>Politicians have been slow to take a stance in favor of cannabis, even though most of us know it can be a life-changing, medically useful drug. Some have supported passive measures here and there trying to give states some freedom without themselves taking a stand. For example, the <a href="https://www.congress.gov/amendment/113th-congress/house-amendment/748/text" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Rohrenbacher-Blumenauer Amendment</a>, which has to be renewed annually by Congress into the spending bill, prevents the Department of Justice from using federal funds to seek action against medical marijuana activity that has been legalized in that state. Some have tried to inaccurately portray cannabis as a partisan liberal issue, but even democrats have been shy to give full support. However, as <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal_government/democratic-leader-announces-new-acceptance-of-marijuana/2018/04/20/d14916c2-44c4-11e8-b2dc-b0a403e4720a_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.775be737d656" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Washington Post</a> reported, Sen. Schumer has acknowledged that the American people have evolved on this issue and it’s time for a big change. </p>


<p>As our trusted Riverside <a href="/services/business-licensing-state-and-local-medical-marijuana-licenses-mm/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">cannabis business</a> attorneys can explain, by removing the Schedule I status, the federal government would not be legalizing marijuana per say. That would require Congress to create and pass regulations and rules for how the cannabis industry would function nationwide. Rather by removing it from the list, marijuana becomes decriminalized and whatever laws are established by each state would become the highest authority unless Congress takes further action. It would also acknowledge that marijuana has no business being classified Schedule I, a designation given to drugs that have no medical benefits, are addictive, and are harmful. Examples of other drugs on this list are heroin and LSD. Removing this classification would also open the doors to much needed funding for medical marijuana testing and research, that previously has been restricted.</p>


<p>It is to be expected that there would still be some fringe people who would still be clinging to archaic ideas about marijuana. After all,  the rampant anti-marijuana propaganda of the past century was pretty powerful and is difficult to deprogram from the American psyche. But it is unconscionable that those politicians who know the evidence and science would continue to stand by and allow so many constituents to be branded as criminals in the eyes of the Department of Justice. Attorney General Jeff Sessions is one of the people more persuaded by propaganda than evidence on this issue and has vowed to enforce marijuana’s Schedule I status. This is why declassification is more important now than with the past administration, whose DOJ was more sympathetic on the matter.</p>


<p>It’s remarkable to look around at how far we’ve come since 1996 when California was the first state to pass medical marijuana protections with Proposition 215. Now there are now 29 states as well as the District of Columbia that have legalized medical marijuana. Of those states, eight also allow recreational use. That means the majority of people in this country live where marijuana has been legalized by the state. Our attorneys support federal declassification of marijuana as a vital step in the protections of the rights of patients and responsible recreational users in California.</p>


<p><em>The Los Angeles CANNABIS LAW Group represents growers, dispensaries, collectives, patients, defendants, workers and those facing criminal marijuana charges. Call us at 949-375-4734.</em></p>


<p>Additional Resources:</p>


<p><a href="https://www.npr.org/2018/04/20/604136116/on-4-20-chuck-schumer-to-introduce-bill-to-decriminalize-marijuana" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">On 4/20, Chuck Schumer to Introduce Bill to Decriminalize Marijuana</a>, April 20, 2018, By April Davis, NPR</p>


<p>More Blog Entries:</p>


<p><a href="/blog/medical-marijuana-advocates-take-aim-goliath-department-justice-court/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Medical Marijuana Advocates Take Aim at Goliath Department of Justice in Court</a>, Feb. 17, 2018, Cannabis Law Group</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[California Growers Have Highest Rate of Noncompliance With Cannabis Regulations]]></title>
                <link>https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/california-growers-highest-rate-noncompliance-cannabis-regulations/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/california-growers-highest-rate-noncompliance-cannabis-regulations/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Cannabis Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California marijuana business lawyers]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California compliance attorneys]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[cannabis regulations]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los Angeles cannabis regulations]]></category>
                
                
                
                    <media:thumbnail url="https://los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer-com.justia.site/wp-content/uploads/sites/1058/2017/10/cannabis-fines.jpg" />
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>California is posed to instantly become the country’s largest marijuana market when lawful sales of cannabis for recreational use begin on January 2, 2018. While this presents vast opportunity for investors and entrepreneurs, it also presents a wealth of regulatory challenges. Businesses often face greater regulation in California than other states, simply due to the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>California is posed to instantly become the country’s largest marijuana market when lawful sales of cannabis for recreational use begin on January 2, 2018. While this presents vast opportunity for investors and entrepreneurs, it also presents a wealth of regulatory challenges. Businesses often face greater regulation in California than other states, simply due to the size of California’s legal and regulatory codes. Cannabis businesses will have the added headache of new and changing regulations in a brand new industry. Yet, with preparation and planning, and skilled legal advice from an experienced marijuana business compliance attorney, business owners can keep their operations compliant and profitable throughout the coming changes in regulatory framework applicable to California’s cannabis industry.</p>


<p>
<strong>California’s Compliance Rating</strong>
<a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/debraborchardt/2017/10/19/marijuana-regulations-adherence-compliance/#ee323a17beb2" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Forbes</a> reports on recent compliance data issued by Adherence Compliance, a cannabis compliance company based in Denver, Colorado. Adherence Compliance has applied predictive analytics and machine learning to the cannabis industry in order to determine the compliance areas in which a business is likely to fail. Its data has found California cannabis business owners to be the least compliant across the country. Here, owners average sixteen compliance infractions per inspection, and score an average of 74.4 out of 100 on Adherence’s compliance metrics. By contrast: Illinois was found to be the most compliant state, and averaged 91.1 out of 100 on the same tests. It is worth noting that Illinois has a relatively new and small program of strict regulation. Colorado, in comparison, has an older and larger program of regulation, which has complex applications for both recreational and medicinal use. Its cannabis business owners scored an average of 82.9 out of 100 on the Adherence Compliance metric. 
<strong>Ensuring Your Compliance in an Uncertain Regulatory Environment</strong>
The State of California is facing a task of unprecedented proportions. On January 2, 2018, an entire industry will instantly change from illicit to legally regulated. Applications for business licenses are available, but the regulations which will govern business licenses and lawful cannabis business operations are not yet finalized. They will continue to change, adapt and expand as business operations spread throughout California. An effective business strategy must be both proactive to anticipated changes, and quickly reactive when changes occur. Proactive measure include preparing a business license application and submitting it as soon as possible, so that your business license is ready to be processed as soon as the state begins issuing them on January 2. It is also important to have all necessary local permits and licenses ready before business operations commence. And yet, not all regulatory changes can be anticipated. It is important for business owners to be aware of changes in the law that will impact their licenses, permits, and daily operations. An experienced Los Angeles <a href="/services/business-licensing-state-and-local-medical-marijuana-licenses-mm/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">cannabis business licensing attorney</a> can help your business obtain all necessary permits and licenses, and ensure that your operations are compliant with all state and local regulations. Don’t run the risk of facing criminal charges, civil fines, and administrative penalties for noncompliant cannabis business operations.  
<em>The Los Angeles Cannabis Law Group represents growers, dispensaries, collectives, patients </em><em>and those facing marijuana charges. Call us at 949-375-4734.</em>
Additional Resources:
<a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/debraborchardt/2017/10/19/marijuana-regulations-adherence-compliance/#7cbdfb57beb2" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Marijuana Businesses, Particularly in California, Struggle to Navigate a Thicket of Regulations</em></a>, October 19, 2017, by Debra Borchardt, Forbes
More Blog Entries:
<a href="/blog/expanding-marijuana-regulations-creating-state-government-hiring-binge/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Expanding Marijuana Regulations are Creating a State Government Hiring Binge</em></a><em>, </em>October 14, 2017, by Cannabis Law Group</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>