appointment almost a year ago, he has promised to uphold federal cannabis law, which classifies marijuana as a Schedule I narcotic under Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. Section 812. This path is in stark contrast with the narrative in the rest of the country: 30 states as well as Washington, D.C., have some form of marijuana legalization on the books. Eight of those states (including California) and the District of Columbia allow recreational marijuana sales and use, with more planning ballot initiatives and legislative votes in 2018.

Up until now, those states have been able to manage their marijuana laws as they saw fit without meddling from the federal government thanks to a directive put in place at the Department of Justice during Barack Obama’s presidency that discouraged enforcement.

However, Sessions recently rescinded that directive, opening the door for prosecutors to go after states that have established legal cannabis. It’s unclear at this point whether prosecutors will actively start enforcement. Sessions described the move as simply him doing his job and enforcing the law. He also said he would leave it up to U.S. attorneys to determine what issues should be their top priority based on their resources. But the U.S. attorney in Colorado has already stated he intends to align practices with Sessions’ latest guidance.

President Trump seems to have flipped on this issue, stating last year that he would leave the issue up to the states, but recently siding with the Attorney General that federal law should be enforced. This has added more unnecessary confusion to citizens who believed this administration would align with the conservative tendency toward states’ rights.

Sessions is already getting pushback. Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner (R) has suggested not confirming nominees to the Justice Department should Sessions continue down this path.

It’s no surprise Congress might fight back considering the growing popularity of marijuana legalization among constituents nationwide, who understand its tremendous benefits. A CBS News poll last year showed 61 percent of Americans support full marijuana legalization. That number increases dramatically to 88 percent when speaking about medical marijuana. More telling, 71 percent of those surveyed are against efforts by the federal government to interfere in states who have passed their own cannabis laws.

Besides personal opinion shifting, there are the enormous economic benefits of marijuana to take into consideration. If prosecutors start filing charges or seizing marijuana-related property, it would have devastating consequences on the local economies and state coffers in regions where the drug is legal.

Our Orange County marijuana legalization lawyers know this is a critical time in the country. While education and first-hand experience has helped most Americans dispel myths about marijuana, there are still growing pains while some hold on to outdated information. That’s why it’s more important than ever for marijuana businesses to seek guidance from lawyers knowledgeable in the continually evolving marijuana laws. We will stay informed on how changes at the local, state, and federal level could affect your business and help your business remain agile to these changes and establish a strong defense should legal issues arise.

The Los Angeles CANNABIS LAW Group represents growers, dispensaries, collectives, patients, defendants, workers and those facing criminal marijuana charges. Call us at 949-375-4734.

Additional Resources:

Use of Legalized Marijuana Threatened as Sessions Rescinds Obama-Era Directive that Eased Federal Enforcement, Jan. 4, 2018, By Matt Zapotosky, Sari Horwitz, and Joel Achenbach, The Washington Post

More Blog Entries:

Jeff Sessions Intends to Crack Down on Medical Marijuana Where it is Legal, Dec. 10, 2017, Cannabis Law Group

Now, federal prosecutors say they are giving up.

The center had been the subject of scorn by former U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag since 2012. The effort to shut down the dispensary was part of a bigger mission to close down the entire medical marijuana industry in California. This decision has shown that effort now to have been unsuccessful.

In a statement released by Steve DeAngelo, the facility’s executive director, the facility underscored its promise to “never abandon our patients.”

Mayor Libby Schaaf expressed delight, calling this, “A great day for Oakland and for all of California.” She went on to say the federal government had wasted precious resources and tax dollars on a misguided effort that ultimately served only to impede the efforts of Californians to have safe and legal access to medicinal marijuana.

Harborside was far from the only dispensary caught up in the federal crackdown. Unfortunately, many of those were forced to close down. Our Los Angeles marijuana lawyers know one of the reasons Harborside was able to stand its ground was because it had the resources to do so. The facility (which also has a branch in San Jose) rakes in an estimated $25 million annually in marijuana sales.

On the flip side, it was this success that made it a jewel of a target for Haag. She filed her civil forfeiture action against the facility in the summer of 2012, asserting that its operations were in direct conflict with U.S. drug statutes. In a civil forfeiture action, prosecutors can seize money and assets that are proven to be derived from illegal drug profits. The law was originally intended to give prosecutors the power to pursue drug lords – not medical marijuana dispensaries.

Still, Haag insisted that the facility was so big that it could not avoid the propensity to abuse California’s medical marijuana laws. The dispensary was unable to keep the drugs out of the hands of those who shouldn’t have it, she insisted.

But Harborside had some powerful friends ready to go to bat. The City of Oakland, for example, filed its own lawsuit against the federal government, seeking to block the U.S. Department of Justice form seizing the facility’s property. Ultimately, that lawsuit was dismissed – a decision affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit – because the city wasn’t actually a party to the original action (despite the city’s assertion that it had a vested interest in the outcome).

Still, the dispensary won a number of legal victories that kept it open pending the federal legal challenges.

Two years ago, Congress approved a measure that blocks the DOJ from using federal money to pursue medical marijuana facilities in states where the drug is legal.

Although federal prosecutors have declined to comment on the case, it does appear this signals the waning of the federal war in marijuana in California.

The Los Angeles CANNABIS LAW Group represents growers, dispensaries, collectives, patients and those facing marijuana charges. Call us at 949-375-4734.

Additional Resources:

Feds Give Up on Effort to Seize Nation’s Largest Medical Marijuana Dispensary, May 4, 2016, By Phillip Smith, The Daily Chronic

More Blog Entries:

Medical Cannabis Employees in California Required to be Patients Themselves, April 17, 2016, L.A. Medical Marijuana Lawyer