<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Oregon marijuana lawyer - Cannabis Law Group]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/tags/oregon-marijuana-lawyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/tags/oregon-marijuana-lawyer/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Cannabis Law Group's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:41:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Cannabis Business Licensing Woes in Portland Costing $22M/ Month]]></title>
                <link>https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/cannabis-business-licensing-woes-portland-costing-22m-month/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/cannabis-business-licensing-woes-portland-costing-22m-month/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Cannabis Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:41:20 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Oregon marijuana lawyers]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Oregon marijuana attorneys]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Oregon marijuana lawyer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Portland marijuana lawyers]]></category>
                
                
                
                    <media:thumbnail url="https://los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer-com.justia.site/wp-content/uploads/sites/1058/2016/12/cannabis.jpg" />
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The cannabis licensing process in Portland is reportedly so bogged down with problems, entrepreneurs and businesses are taking a major financial hit every month. Some have even been forced out of business. That’s according to a new report released by the city of Portland and Office of Neighborhood Involvement. A chief economist who works closely&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>The cannabis licensing process in Portland is reportedly so bogged down with problems, entrepreneurs and businesses are taking a major financial hit every month. Some have even been forced out of business.</p>


<p>That’s according to a new report released by the city of Portland and Office of Neighborhood Involvement. A chief economist who works closely with marijuana businesses hoping to forge a legal path into local industry says the complicated bureaucracy of the process has forced some applicants to go belly-up. As of last month, only 19 out of 355 applicants had received their licenses. Another 30 cleared the process, but were waiting to pay their respective fees.</p>


<p>The economist noted that if the city fails to license a significant number of more cannabis businesses soon, the effect on the marijuana market in Oregon overall is going to be greatly adverse.</p>


<p>Starting on January 1st, sales of recreational marijuana at medical marijuana dispensaries was put to an end. Many businesses want to make moves to cater more to the recreational market. But those businesses by law have to be licensed by the Oregon Liquor Control Commission. Statewide, the agency has issued some 500 licences and had anticipated issuing some 900 more by the close of 2016. However, because of the problems in Portland, a number of marijuana companies in the city might not have the necessary credentials needed to be in operation.</p>


<p>Our Portland marijuana attorneys know that these licensing issues are the second major problem Portland marijuana dispensaries have faced of late. In October, the state required a series of stringent new packaging and testing standards. That resulted in smaller supplies and lower sales. Some businesses were forced to close shop.</p>


<p>Meanwhile, the state is potentially losing out on an estimated $1.3 million in monthly tax revenue due to issues in Portland. The city itself is losing an estimated $233,000 a month in tax revenue.</p>


<p>Those in the industry called it ironic that the city that has vowed to do its best to promote economic activity would fail to be proactive on this issue. In recent weeks, Portland has been referred to as one of the state’s least cannabis-friendly cities.</p>


<p>The new licensing requirement policies were imposed in the fall, and those were in addition to the use and occupancy permitting stipulations. Several commissioners have discussed taking another look at the rules and whether revision is required.</p>


<p>A senior policy adviser said it is on the city’s near-future agenda.</p>


<p>Marijuana dispensary owners lament the lack of transparency and communication in the licensing process. Some have characterized it as confusing, convoluted and daunting. Our marijuana <a href="/services/business-licensing-state-and-local-medical-marijuana-licenses-mm/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">business licensing</a> lawyers know understand that some owners have been tossed back and forth among city agencies, with the requirements seeming set and changed arbitrarily – and after the fact. On top of all that, the wait times at every leg of the process are onerous.</p>


<p>Although some proponents of these regulations contend this is simply the result of a new industry not accustomed to having to deal with a bureaucracy, cannabis industry insiders say it goes beyond that. This bottleneck of licensing has meant that the livelihoods of these business owners are on the line. The licensing fees are extraordinarily high and there seems to be a basic lack of understanding as to how the industry is operating elsewhere in the state. Businesses that need help with this and other bureaucratic processes should contact an experienced marijuana lawyer.</p>


<p><em>The Los Angeles CANNABIS LAW Group represents growers, dispensaries, collectives, patients and those facing marijuana charges. Call us at 949-375-4734.</em></p>


<p>Additional Resources:</p>


<p><a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/news/2016/12/13/portland-s-cannabis-licensing-logjam-could-cost.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Portland’s cannabis licensing logjam could cost businesses $22M a month</a>, Dec. 13, 2016, By Pete Danko, Portland Business Journal</p>


<p>More Blog Entries:</p>


<p><a href="/blog/documentary-details-underground-medical-marijuana-trade-uk/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Documentary Details Underground Medical Marijuana Trade in the UK</a>, Nov. 28, 2016, Portland Marijuana Lawyer Blog</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Tainted Marijuana Health Alert Issued by Oregon Officials]]></title>
                <link>https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/tainted-marijuana-health-alert-issued-oregon-officials/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/tainted-marijuana-health-alert-issued-oregon-officials/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Cannabis Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:44:14 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California Marijuana Dispensaries]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Oregon marijuana lawyers]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[L.A. marijuana attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[L.A. marijuana lawyers]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Oregon marijuana lawyer]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A series of cannabis-related health alerts was issued in Oregon recently, after health officials cited concerns over high levels of pesticide residue on some batches. According to The Oregonian, the first alert in mid-October concerned two strains sold by a Portland-area dispensary called New Leave that had high levels of an insecticide called spinosad. The&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>A series of cannabis-related health alerts was issued in Oregon recently, after health officials cited concerns over high levels of pesticide residue on some batches. </p>

<div class="wp-block-image alignright">
<figure class="is-resized"><img decoding="async" alt="marijuana" src="/static/2016/11/marijuanaholland-300x225.jpg" style="width:300px;height:225px" /></figure>
</div>

<p>According to <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2016/11/oregon_issues_health_alert_for.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Oregonian</a>, the first alert in mid-October concerned two strains sold by a Portland-area dispensary called New Leave that had high levels of an insecticide called spinosad. The marijuana was sold to some 130 consumers over two days. The strains were dubbed, “Dr. Jack” and “Marion Berry.” The Oregon Health Authority reported the spinosad levels in the former batch were 42 parts per million while the latter had 22 parts per million. The maximum allowable by health regulations is 0.2 parts per million.</p>


<p>The second alert came earlier this month when it was determined that three strains of marijuana flowers sold from dispensaries in North Bend, Eugene and Salem also had unsafe levels of spinosad. One of those batches, “Dutch Treat,” sold in Eugene to about 30 people, had 0.9 parts per million of the chemical. Meanwhile, two other strains – Dryzle and Pleeze – were sold to approximately 340 people at two dispensaries between mid-to-late October. Those strains had high levels of a chemical called piperonyl butoxide, which in itself is not a pesticide, but is a powerful and potentially dangerous ingredient that is only allowed to have 2 parts per million. In the Pleeze and Dryzl strains, there were between 15.39 and 16.24 parts per million, based on independent lab tests.</p>


<p>The state hasn’t released information regarding the identities of the growers, and it’s also not clear how these strains made it to store shelves after they reportedly flunked the lab testes. Health department officials are trying to piece together what happened. Producers are supposed to destroy products that fail to meet those stringent standards. Of course, cultivators would do so at a loss – and perhaps a substantial one – but it’s not clear if the product was cleared for distribution intentionally or if it was some kind of oversight. In either case, our L.A. and Oregon <a href="/services/civil-litigation-medical-marijuana-collectives-dispensaries/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">marijuana lawyers</a> know this is something that requires closer examination.</p>


<p>Cultivators and distributors who follow the strict regulatory guidelines do so at a cost, but it ensures the safety and well-being of customers and the public. Businesses that may not follow the rules in turn have an unfair competitive advantage – at the expense of public safety. We’re hoping, though, that this was merely a procedural error that can be quickly identified and corrected.</p>


<p>It’s worth noting, however, that California may have a fair way to go in these regard. A company called Steep Hill labs, based in California, conducted research that concluded nearly 85 percent of marijuana products tested positive for residual pesticides. What’s more: These plants would have failed Oregon’s regulations. As the CEO of the lab stated, smoking a joint that is contaminated with pesticides could be potentially lethal. This is something that deserves our immediate attention and resources.</p>


<p>It was only in October that Oregon began regulation and monitoring of “accepted” levels of pesticide residue that is allowed to be on marijuana sold to the public. In investigation last year by The Oregonian revealed that relaxed state rules and minimal oversight resulted in laboratory practices that weren’t consistent, which meant test results were all over the map – and marijuana with pesticides was routinely on the shelves.</p>


<p>Today, the state health authority requires that any labs conducting marijuana testing must be state authorized.</p>


<p><em>The Los Angeles CANNABIS LAW Group represents growers, dispensaries, collectives, patients and those facing marijuana charges. Call us at 949-375-4734.</em></p>


<p>Additional Resources:</p>


<p><a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2016/11/oregon_issues_health_alert_for.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Oregon issues health alert for three marijuana strains with pesticide residue</a>, Nov. 3, 2016, By Molly Harbarger, The Oregonian</p>


<p>More Blog Entries:
<a href="/blog/report-oregon-recreational-marijuana-sales-off-strong-start/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Report: Oregon Recreational Marijuana Sales Off to Strong Start,</a> Oct. 27, 2016, Oregon Marijuana Lawyer Blog</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>