<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[business attorney CBD - Cannabis Law Group]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/tags/business-attorney-cbd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/tags/business-attorney-cbd/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Cannabis Law Group's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 05:57:06 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Maryland’s Hemp Industry Faces Uncertain Future: A Deep Dive into the New CBD Regulations]]></title>
                <link>https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/marylands-hemp-industry-faces-uncertain-future-a-deep-dive-into-the-new-cbd-regulations/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/marylands-hemp-industry-faces-uncertain-future-a-deep-dive-into-the-new-cbd-regulations/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Cannabis Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 05:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[CBD Attorney]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[business attorney CBD]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[CBD]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Maryland CBD Lawyer]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent turn of events, Maryland’s hemp industry is facing significant challenges due to new regulations that have come into effect. Hemp producers and stakeholders in the state have taken legal action against the state’s officials, challenging the restrictions placed on the sale and distribution of CBD products. The New Law’s Implications Starting this&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>In a recent turn of events, Maryland’s hemp industry is facing significant challenges due to new regulations that have come into effect. Hemp producers and stakeholders in the state have taken legal action against the state’s officials, challenging the restrictions placed on the sale and distribution of CBD products.</p>


<p><strong>The New Law’s Implications</strong></p>


<p>Starting this month, CBD products, including popular items like extracts, gummies, and topicals, are deemed illegal in Maryland if they contain more than 2.5 milligrams of THC per package. This threshold, according to many CBD operators, effectively removes a majority of products from the market. Additionally, the law explicitly bans delta-8 THC, a sought-after synthetic THC variant derived from hemp-based CBD.</p>


<p>A group of hemp producers from Boonsboro, who are among the plaintiffs, highlighted that most of their products, which were previously legal and derived from hemp, now fail to meet the new standards. They emphasized that these products were not classified as illegal marijuana under the prior law and were distributed without requiring a license.</p>


<p><strong>State’s Perspective: Consumer Safety First</strong></p>


<p>Maryland officials have defended the new regulations, stating their primary goal is to shield consumers from unregulated products that could pose potential health risks. The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) currently prohibits the promotion of cannabis derivatives in food items. Both CBD and delta-8 THC have not received approval for consumption by humans or animals. Furthermore, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has categorized delta-8 THC as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).</p>


<p><strong>Legal Battle Ensues</strong></p>


<p>The lawsuit, which was officially filed on July 24 in a Circuit Court in Washington County, is directed against several state entities and officials, including Gov. Wes Moore, the Maryland Cannabis Administration, and the Maryland Alcohol, Tobacco, and Cannabis Commission. The core of the lawsuit revolves around House and Senate Bill 516, which introduced a comprehensive cannabis law encompassing both hemp and marijuana.</p>


<p><strong>A ‘Monopoly’ in the Making?</strong></p>


<p>The plaintiffs argue that the state’s new regulations inadvertently grant a near-monopoly to licensed marijuana operators. This is due to the imposed THC concentration caps in CBD products and the stringent cannabis licensing process. A <a href="/services/cbd/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>CBD Lawyer</strong></a> representing the hemp stakeholders, expressed concerns about the challenges hemp operators face in obtaining the necessary licenses to sell their products under the new THC restrictions. The current licensing prerequisites demand that at least 65% ownership and control be maintained by an individual who also satisfies other rigorous criteria.</p>


<p>Furthermore, the plaintiffs believe that the licensing procedure contravenes Maryland’s anti-monopoly statutes and the state’s Equal Protection Act. They argue that the law unfairly favors specific groups during the initial licensing application phase.</p>


<p><strong>Economic Implications</strong></p>


<p>The hemp industry’s preliminary estimates indicate that the new regulations could lead to a staggering loss of over $560 million in CBD sales. This could potentially jeopardize around 4,200 jobs, force the closure of approximately 370 businesses, and prompt 60 more to relocate out of Maryland.</p>


<p>Despite efforts to halt the law’s implementation during the previous legislative session, it remains in effect. Maryland now joins its neighboring state, Virginia, in imposing stringent restrictions on the hemp sector. Similarly, states like New York and Tennessee have enacted laws that either limit THC content in hemp-derived products or mandate specific business licenses for their sale.</p>


<p><strong>In Conclusion</strong></p>


<p>The future of Maryland’s hemp industry hangs in the balance as producers and stakeholders grapple with the new regulations. As the legal battle unfolds, it remains to be seen how these changes will shape the state’s CBD market and its broader economic landscape. For more insights and legal guidance on the matter, consider consulting with a <strong><a href="/" rel="noopener" target="_new">CBD Attorney</a></strong> from the Cannabis Law Group.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[California CBD Regulations Imminent]]></title>
                <link>https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/california-cbd-regulations-imminent/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer.com/blog/california-cbd-regulations-imminent/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Cannabis Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 14:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California marijuana business lawyers]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[CBD lawyer]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[business attorney CBD]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[CBD business lawyer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[hemp cbd business lawyer]]></category>
                
                
                
                    <media:thumbnail url="https://los-angeles-marijuana-lawyer-com.justia.site/wp-content/uploads/sites/1058/2022/05/California-CBD-regulation.jpg" />
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>For years, the State of California dragged its heels on regulating hemp-derived CBD. Numerous legislative efforts had failed time-and-again – until last year, with the passage of AB-45, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, which allowed for the inclusion of hemp and CBD extracts in food, beverages, cosmetics, dietary supplements, processed pet foods and more –&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>For years, the State of California dragged its heels on regulating hemp-derived CBD. Numerous legislative efforts had failed time-and-again – until last year, with the passage of <a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB45" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">AB-45</a>, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, which allowed for the inclusion of hemp and CBD extracts in food, beverages, cosmetics, dietary supplements, processed pet foods and more – assuming they contained less than 0.3% THC. However, nothing has really happened since – until now. Just a few days ago, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) has proposed emergency regulations – mostly dealing with registration for industrial hemp manufacturers. </p>


<p>As our <a href="/services/cbd/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Los Angeles CBD business attorneys</a> can explain, the key points in the emergency action are as follows:
</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Hemp product manufacturers will be granted different types of registrations, licenses, and/or authorizations from the CDPH, depending on the type of product they make. Those that make many different types of hemp/CBD products may need numerous registrations.</li>
<li>Out-of-state hemp/CBD manufacturers that want to import products to California will need to register with the CDPH.</li>
<li>“Enrollment and oversight authorization” is required at each location, lasts one year, and cannot be transferred.</li>
<li>Applicants requesting oversight authorization must provide detained information about not only the type of product, but its sources, extract methods, etc. These must be signed under penalty of perjury.</li>
<li>Fees are based on gross revenue accrued in the 12 months prior. New applicants will need to estimate their fees, and the formulas for calculating them are a bit complex. The fee structures for CBD product types and extract manufacturers are different.</li>
</ul>


<p>
These are just the primary points of the emergency action. It’s imperative that anyone in the CBD business or hemp business in California consult with their business attorney to make sure all registration, oversight, and licensure paperwork is properly drafted and timely submitted.</p>


<p>We expect that there will soon be more in-depth regulatory guidelines issued for things like advertising and marketing, as well as consumer sales. But the promising takeaway for CBD manufacturers – despite coming four years after the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill – we finally have some movement on this front in California.</p>


<p>In addition to establishing a registration requirement for manufacturers of hemp products, AB-45 requires independent laboratory testing of hemp extracts in its final raw form, to ensure it doesn’t exceed the maximum allowable amount of THC, as well as to make sure the product is uncontaminated. Further, hemp products that are food, beverages, or dietary supplements will require:
</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Labels with a scannable barcode, website URL, or QR code linking that will provide analysis certificates showing each batch’s THC content.</li>
<li>Expiration and best-by dates.</li>
<li>Statements stipulating that children and pregnant/breastfeeding people should avoid using the product without talking to a doctor.</li>
<li>A statement saying the product should be kept out of children’s reach.</li>
<li>Statement indicating the FDA hasn’t evaluated the product for either safety or efficacy.</li>
</ul>


<p>
The emergency action by the CDPH is currently awaiting a 30-day public comment period. Any CBD or hemp product maker should be reaching out to their legal department/contracted attorney to discuss the appropriate next steps to ensure their operations are properly aligned with the law.</p>


<p><em>The Los Angeles CANNABIS LAW Group represents growers, dispensaries, ancillary companies, patients, doctors and those facing marijuana charges. Call us at 949-375-4734.</em></p>


<p>Additional Resources:</p>


<p><a href="https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/OLS/Pages/DPH-22-002E_Industrial_Hemp_Fee_Page.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">DPH-22-002E Industrial Hemp Fee</a>, April 25, 2022, California Department of Public Health</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>